<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343</id><updated>2011-04-21T16:20:54.373-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Conover on media</title><subtitle type='html'>A front-row seat at the final bonfire.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>200</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-504437500281944034</id><published>2008-04-15T02:02:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-15T02:09:22.390-04:00</updated><title type='text'>5 Lessons from newspaper contests</title><summary type='text'>Here's a humbling series of events, and the still unpopular lessons I learned as a result:  In February 2005, my co-workers put a crown on my head and carried me to the front of a banquet hall to receive a plaque that said I was the state's Journalist of the Year. I'd secretly dreamed of winning that award for years, but it took the end of my career as an editor to make me eligible.  I got my </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/504437500281944034'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/504437500281944034'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/04/5-lessons-from-newspaper-contests.html' title='5 Lessons from newspaper contests'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-7857321207976965446</id><published>2008-03-19T15:43:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-19T17:17:38.996-04:00</updated><title type='text'>BONUS POST: "Ad hocracy"</title><summary type='text'>I'm breaking up my series on newspapers to float an idea that I'm hoping to present at a workshop next month.It comes from this basic observation: We've already got the free tools to construct ad hoc breaking news networks around discrete events: Blogs act as a reverse-order chronology of evolving events; Twitter gives us two way communication across platforms, plus a means to capture text via </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/7857321207976965446'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/7857321207976965446'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/03/bonus-post-ad-hocracy.html' title='BONUS POST: &quot;Ad hocracy&quot;'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-6243829618277264307</id><published>2008-03-16T00:01:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-16T00:18:00.758-04:00</updated><title type='text'>MEDIA REVOLUTION: Why The Tower Must Fall</title><summary type='text'>From a generic perspective, it’s probably fair to say that the public history of new media began five years ago this month with the invasion of Iraq. Technorati was tracking fewer than half a million blogs in March 2003, but 24/7 coverage of the war meant cable news needed things to talk about, and there were the bloggers – this strange new species of pundit – always talking, talking, talking.  I</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/6243829618277264307'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/6243829618277264307'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/03/media-revolution-or-why-tower-must-fall.html' title='MEDIA REVOLUTION: Why The Tower Must Fall'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-803256347730551618</id><published>2008-03-11T18:14:00.008-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-11T19:37:20.829-04:00</updated><title type='text'>An old idea has a new future</title><summary type='text'>Back in the late 1990s, at roughly the same time as the advent of the ill-fated :CueCat, my employer invested in a failed technology called "GoCode." Both of these devices had the same goal: to connect print readers easily to the Web. :CueCat was a bigger flop because it had a bigger footprint, but I'm sticking with the GoCode scanner system because I got up close and personal with it.Here's how </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/803256347730551618'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/803256347730551618'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/03/old-idea-has-new-future.html' title='An old idea has a new future'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-68348831818336349</id><published>2008-02-21T11:02:00.007-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-21T13:16:36.058-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Foundations of 21st century journalism</title><summary type='text'>Up to this point, I've been talking about some of the concepts that shape my thinking about media and journalism: Quality; epistemology; the cultural flaws that warp these discussions; the ideas that I think will lead us around those obstacles to answers. But I haven't really offered any answers of my own.One reason: What use are they? They're not scholarly. They're not researched and footnoted. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/68348831818336349'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/68348831818336349'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/02/foundations-of-21st-century-journalism.html' title='Foundations of 21st century journalism'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-993727972080765388</id><published>2008-02-18T20:41:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-18T22:54:57.423-05:00</updated><title type='text'>"Blackboxing" news judgment</title><summary type='text'>Orson Scott Card's "Ender" series wouldn't be much of a story without a device known as "the ansible," a sort of sub-space radio that allows people to communicate instantaneously from planet to planet across light years of empty space. The story doesn't work without it... but how does it work?Card's answer? It doesn't matter. The ansible is a black box: In science fiction terms, that means that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/993727972080765388'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/993727972080765388'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/02/blackboxing-news-judgment.html' title='&quot;Blackboxing&quot; news judgment'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-8794311439208648619</id><published>2008-02-17T21:27:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-17T22:24:05.213-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Gloom and Doom</title><summary type='text'>I hear this quite a bit: Journalists (particularly print journalists) are tired of hearing all the "doom and gloom" about what lies ahead for the industry.The statement is usually followed by a call for "solutions" and bolstered by high-ranking reassurances that "newspapers aren't going away."Which probably explains why I'd rather talk about doom and gloom than sweetness and light.Some points </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/8794311439208648619'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/8794311439208648619'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/02/gloom-and-doom.html' title='Gloom and Doom'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-1280011329158659783</id><published>2008-02-06T18:11:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-06T19:56:55.742-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Why quality is a moving target</title><summary type='text'>I got my first regular job at a professional newspaper in my final semester of college. It was a job that no longer exists: Paste-up guy for The Chapel Hill Newspaper.In those days, editors used pencils to draw page layouts on pieces of paper and stories came out of typesetting machines in long single columns. My job was to take those typeset columns, run them through a machine that coated the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/1280011329158659783'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/1280011329158659783'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/02/why-quality-is-moving-target.html' title='Why quality is a moving target'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-6820228778639358290</id><published>2008-02-06T14:31:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-06T18:01:26.637-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Are you thinking, or "quorum sensing?"</title><summary type='text'>In the fall of 2005 I wrote one of my final science-beat articles on research into a biological phenomena called "quorum sensing." Specifically, quorum sensing represents a form of chemical communication between bacteria. That's vaguely interesting, but the exact moment at which quorum sensing transformed my understanding of the world took place when a microbiologist described bacterial behavior </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/6820228778639358290'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/6820228778639358290'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/02/are-you-thinking-or-quorum-sensing.html' title='Are you thinking, or &quot;quorum sensing?&quot;'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-368591900170510204</id><published>2008-02-05T22:39:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-18T09:33:38.304-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Quality and other essential bullshit</title><summary type='text'>"The place to improve the world is first in one's own heart and head and hands, and then to work outward from there. Other people can talk about how to expand the destiny of mankind. I just want to talk about how to fix a motorcycle. I think that what I have to say has more lasting value." -- Robert Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, 1974Our topic for Feb. 25th (absent a spiffy </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/368591900170510204'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/368591900170510204'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/02/quality-and-other-essential-bullshit.html' title='Quality and other essential bullshit'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JZcf3j4Zn5c/R6k90_Y60II/AAAAAAAAABg/JplSFpjYIeo/s72-c/grade_a_bullshit_alert_trans.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-8434515272775699251</id><published>2008-02-05T14:27:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-18T09:31:41.966-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Wake up!</title><summary type='text'>I mothballed this blog in 2007 for many reasons. Some of them were conceptual (I felt that discussing media absent the larger context of culture was pointless); others were personal (I'd stepped down from a "management" level job and returned to reporting).But it occurred to me last week that it was time to bring it back in a new, and very specific, incarnation: From now until Feb. 24, I'll be </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/8434515272775699251'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/8434515272775699251'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2008/02/wake-up.html' title='Wake up!'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-34615881671826117</id><published>2007-08-08T13:09:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-08T15:00:01.644-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Times-Select RIP</title><summary type='text'>File it under We-Told-You-So: Management at the NYT is preparing to shut down Times-Select, the company's $50-a-year paywall experiment. I don't feel like dancing on its grave, because the idea of paying for certain types of content shouldn't be lost, and Times-Select (in concept, anyway) came close to being that kind of product. But there's a message in this headline that's going to cause a lot </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/34615881671826117'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/34615881671826117'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2007/08/times-select-rip.html' title='Times-Select RIP'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-7194762463691999859</id><published>2007-05-17T12:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-05-17T13:00:13.088-04:00</updated><title type='text'>NEW CULTURE, NEW MEDIA</title><summary type='text'>I spent the weekend at a gathering of what might best be described as the post-mass-media tribe in Black Mountain, N.C.They don't read newspapers, and why should they? Newspapers scorn them to begin with.They don't watch much TV, either.Big music labels piss them off. Small labels that care about music turn them on.They don't like one kind of music: they love all sorts of music.They would rather </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/7194762463691999859'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/7194762463691999859'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2007/05/new-culture-new-media.html' title='NEW CULTURE, NEW MEDIA'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-2594291616071899065</id><published>2007-04-24T11:29:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-04-24T12:13:00.866-04:00</updated><title type='text'>WHAT IF YOUR BUSINESS PLAN WAS LOVE?</title><summary type='text'>I've developed a new schtick for explaining the concept of news judgment to civilians: A newspaper is a big averaging machine, I tell them.Here's how it works: When reporters and editors get new information, they estimate its newspaper value based on their subjective mental picture of the average audience they're trying to satisfy. If they're thinking very clearly, they'll also abstract the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/2594291616071899065'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/2594291616071899065'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2007/04/what-if-your-business-plan-was-love.html' title='WHAT IF YOUR BUSINESS PLAN WAS LOVE?'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-117071303626125617</id><published>2007-02-05T16:27:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-02-05T17:14:12.023-05:00</updated><title type='text'>SHOOT BETTER VIDEO: 33 tips from Ellen Seidler</title><summary type='text'>One of the perks of finishing up one assignment (helping modernize our paper's website) and heading on to the next one (back to the newsroom as a combo print/online features reporter) is that I'm finding cool stuff as I pack up my office. Today's gem: Notes from a fantastic class given last March at the UC-Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism during my week as a 2006 Western Knight Center </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/117071303626125617'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/117071303626125617'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2007/02/shoot-better-video-33-tips-from-ellen.html' title='SHOOT BETTER VIDEO: 33 tips from Ellen Seidler'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-116794687045160571</id><published>2007-01-04T13:37:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-01-04T16:49:08.366-05:00</updated><title type='text'>HYPING HYPER-LOCAL</title><summary type='text'>The big issue in newspapering these days isn't quality or ethics but preservation: preservation of jobs, status, and the printed product, but also to some extent the preservation of our own cultural myths. The aloof-but-wise senior editor. The tough-but-fair city editor. All manner of reporter stereotypes. We desire not only to preserve newspaper journalism in the digital age, but to do so with </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116794687045160571'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116794687045160571'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2007/01/hyping-hyper-local.html' title='HYPING HYPER-LOCAL'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-116620921963803178</id><published>2006-12-15T12:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-12-15T14:01:24.443-05:00</updated><title type='text'>INVEST OR FAIL</title><summary type='text'>We don't know all sorts of things about the business future of online media, but there's one thing that's already quite predictable: the eventual profit-margins in 21st century media are likely to be far less generous than the fat and complacent margins to which we grew addicted in the 20th century.I'm confident about this because we already know that the Web is inherently competitive, and in any</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116620921963803178'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116620921963803178'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/12/invest-or-fail.html' title='INVEST OR FAIL'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-116321971627967010</id><published>2006-11-10T22:29:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-11-10T23:38:59.396-05:00</updated><title type='text'>DEATH TO UNSIGNED EDITORAL ENDORSEMENTS!</title><summary type='text'>Attention, newspaper executives: In case you were wondering what to cut next, the dumbest thing you put in print every damned day are those unsigned editorials written by ... well, who exactly? Even the people in the newsroom don't really know, and the people outside are pretty sure Satan is involved somehow.You've been told this before, but you're creatures of habit, and apparently one of your </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116321971627967010'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116321971627967010'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/11/death-to-unsigned-editoral.html' title='DEATH TO UNSIGNED EDITORAL ENDORSEMENTS!'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-116123018144471119</id><published>2006-10-18T23:09:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-10-19T00:05:32.546-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Hey, let's hire this Winer kid...</title><summary type='text'>Wanted: News organization with vision, guts, asbestos underwear and enormous brass balls, willing to hire free-thinking, outspoken tech-pioneer to serve as chief technology officer. Apply to Dave Winer, somewhere on the road to the future...Today on Scripting News, Dave runs an excellent list of suggestions for news organizations that want to master the transition to the new news. But the last </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116123018144471119'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116123018144471119'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/10/hey-lets-hire-this-winer-kid.html' title='Hey, let&apos;s hire this Winer kid...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-116010750537153708</id><published>2006-10-05T22:56:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-10-07T16:55:37.740-04:00</updated><title type='text'>It's the tools, stupid</title><summary type='text'>Some things are so fundamental that you just have to keep repeating them until people start imagining the concept, and this is one of them: The future of news media and its affects on society isn't going to be shaped by updated versions of the obsolete institutions we already have, but by the invention of technological tools that radically change the rules. Today's mediascape is superhuman in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116010750537153708'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/116010750537153708'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-tools-stupid.html' title='It&apos;s the tools, stupid'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-115880844128498330</id><published>2006-09-20T23:10:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-09-20T23:19:36.556-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Our motto at work</title><summary type='text'></summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/115880844128498330'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/115880844128498330'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/09/our-motto-at-work.html' title='Our motto at work'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-115877300847884922</id><published>2006-09-20T12:06:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-09-20T14:24:11.576-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Commerce hubs and the future of advertising</title><summary type='text'>I've learned three things of consequence since I set aside reporting to work on new-media development last November: first, if your news site sucks, upgrade your content management system; second, stop thinking about documents and start thinking about databases; and third, online advertising is primarily a form of information, and its most profitable future relies on packaging and delivering that</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/115877300847884922'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/115877300847884922'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/09/commerce-hubs-and-future-of.html' title='Commerce hubs and the future of advertising'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-115653419198050092</id><published>2006-08-25T12:41:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2006-08-25T15:29:52.010-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Hope for the indies</title><summary type='text'>Progress toward the new information economy continues to surge and sputter in uneven ways, sometimes confusing us but other times pointing ahead to tantilizing possibilities. I found an example in September's issue of WIRED, in an article about Netflix's new role in creating distribution deals for independent filmmakers.The article (not available online until Sept. 1) showcased the power of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/115653419198050092'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/115653419198050092'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/08/hope-for-indies_115653419198050092.html' title='Hope for the indies'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-114909836559407019</id><published>2006-05-31T13:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-05-31T14:02:54.210-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Corrections: The error of our ways, &amp; vice-versa</title><summary type='text'>A letter to Romanesko from David Cay Johnston, written in response to Ted Vaden's ombudsman's column in the N&amp;O, bears amplification, because Johnston flat-out gets it (although I do disagree with one of his formulaic solutions). He writes (bolded emphasis is mine):The analysis of errors and corrections in Ted Vaden's Sunday column in the Raleigh News &amp; Observer is troubling on many levels -- and</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114909836559407019'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114909836559407019'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/05/corrections-error-of-our-ways-vice.html' title='Corrections: The error of our ways, &amp; vice-versa'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-114685583526709749</id><published>2006-05-05T12:19:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-05-05T18:25:25.966-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Media message? Kill the court jester</title><summary type='text'>So the family downloaded the video of Stephen Colbert at the White House Correspondents Association dinner and gathered around the old monitor to watch.And being a journalism-based household, we all had the same reaction:What in the HELL were these "journalists" doing at a gala event with the people they're supposed to be covering?Most of the reaction to Colbert's performance has focused on how </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114685583526709749'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114685583526709749'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/05/media-message-kill-court-jester.html' title='Media message? Kill the court jester'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-114606813757242880</id><published>2006-04-26T11:44:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2006-04-26T12:15:37.726-04:00</updated><title type='text'>A blog blog</title><summary type='text'>To get some idea of what we've been up to recently, take a peek at a new blog-about-local-blogs that Janet and I started a week ago. We're doing it for the newspaper as part of the new Postscripts project (Janet came up with the brand, logo and slogan), and here's the skinny: We "launched" it on the night of April 18th by quietly sending out the link to two local bloggers.The next morning we had </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114606813757242880'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114606813757242880'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/04/blog-blog.html' title='A blog blog'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-114312789799059714</id><published>2006-03-23T10:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-03-23T10:36:58.803-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Competition and its alternatives</title><summary type='text'>    (Cross-posted from Xark!)I offer this as proof that even really cool ideas can take a while to find their audiences, particularly when that audience is saturated by media in the first place. Anyway, thanks to the few Charleston bloggers I have found and added to my reading list, I've finally encountered something I should have been tracking for weeks:  a Charleston City Paper guy named  Jay </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114312789799059714'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114312789799059714'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/03/competition-and-its-alternatives.html' title='Competition and its alternatives'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-114175876102160794</id><published>2006-03-07T12:57:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-03-08T11:41:14.166-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The campaign against Wikipedia</title><summary type='text'>(Editor's note: This post began as a news item at Xark!, but grew into a stand-alone essay.)I first noticed this back in February while speaking about Web trends to a Public Relations/Business Communications class at a local college. When I asked about Wikipedia, everyone who spoke expressed a clear message: Wikipedia, to them, was not so much a resource as it was a threat.Multiple students </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114175876102160794'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114175876102160794'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/03/campaign-against-wikipedia.html' title='The campaign against Wikipedia'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-114133918604811225</id><published>2006-03-02T10:09:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-03-02T17:44:31.353-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Katrina Tapes</title><summary type='text'>What's really all that new in the AP Katrina video story?In a word: Video.The failure of the Katrina relief effort isn't news. Americans learned back in August and September that the government response to the Katrina disaster was inadequate. And though bias-warrior conservatives tend to blame the media for all negative perceptions of their champions, Katrina swept those arguments away like so </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114133918604811225'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114133918604811225'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/03/katrina-tapes.html' title='The Katrina Tapes'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-114118697711983130</id><published>2006-02-28T23:21:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-28T23:22:57.146-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Forget all that other stuff</title><summary type='text'>Talk media with people who aren't in the media, and you'll figure out pretty quickly that the motives outsiders ascribe to us generally fail to connect with reality because their assumptions have one basic, fundamental flaw: They figure the process of newsgathering is somehow rational and deliberate.Here's a much better picture, from the great Lenslinger: Mad Skills of a Veteran Photog.(</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114118697711983130'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114118697711983130'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/02/forget-all-that-other-stuff.html' title='Forget all that other stuff'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-114021635167450475</id><published>2006-02-17T17:37:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2006-02-17T17:45:51.743-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Journalism from a software perspective</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;  On Feb. 9, while reading up on the web framework Django, my eye gravitated toward an unfamiliar acronym in this sentence: “Django focuses on automating as much as possible and adhering to the DRY principle.”   &lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;   So what’s DRY? To programmers, DRY means “Don’t Repeat Yourself,” and the link explaining the principle led </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114021635167450475'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/114021635167450475'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2006/02/journalism-from-software-perspective.html' title='Journalism from a software perspective'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-113520407453844720</id><published>2005-12-21T16:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-12-22T10:33:15.413-05:00</updated><title type='text'>NYT gots some 'splainin' to do...</title><summary type='text'>I've been waiting, but it's clearly not going to happen. Not on its own accord, anyway. Not out of a sense of transparency or ethics or the public's right to know.The brass at The New York Times thinks its decision to hold a story about the White House's warrantless domestic spying program for more than a year is none of our business. So they're not talking.And, not to put too fine a point on </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/113520407453844720'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/113520407453844720'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/12/nyt-gots-some-splainin-to-do.html' title='NYT gots some &apos;splainin&apos; to do...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-113208946744246817</id><published>2005-11-15T15:54:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-11-30T23:19:19.256-05:00</updated><title type='text'>An online reading list for old and new media</title><summary type='text'>I want to offer the folks in my newsroom a useful reading list on topics related to journalism, emerging media, etc. But rather than build it as a text document, I'm going to build it here.So this is the goal: Instead of compling an exhaustive, show-off list of web resources related to journalism, media, new media, convergence, blah-blah-blah, I'm going to put together an edited list: Not </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/113208946744246817'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/113208946744246817'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/11/online-reading-list-for-old-and-new.html' title='An online reading list for old and new media'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112957230750322576</id><published>2005-10-17T13:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-10-17T14:05:07.523-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The New Media Food Chain</title><summary type='text'>Anybody who has followed Jay Rosen's recent PressThink coverage of the Judith Miller debacle at The New York Times has probably noticed a change in the color of the sky this week. Some future historian will likely declare the Miller case  a milestone in the development of global networked media, concluding with 20-20 hindsight that this was the week when we entered a new world.In the Old World, </summary><link rel='related' href='http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/10/15/mlr_act.html' title='The New Media Food Chain'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112957230750322576'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112957230750322576'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/10/new-media-food-chain.html' title='The New Media Food Chain'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112843949129835367</id><published>2005-10-04T11:17:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-10-04T11:24:51.313-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Media "singularity"</title><summary type='text'>Editor's note: When one of my posts over at Xark! (a criticism of Anderson Cooper called Enough with the posing) initiated an interesting back-and-forth about media credibility and objectivity, it prompted me to write a long comment. I'm cross-posting it here because, as I read over it on the page, it occurred to me that I had inadvertently described a state of media singularity -- an </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112843949129835367'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112843949129835367'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/10/media-singularity.html' title='The Media &quot;singularity&quot;'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112749376355341778</id><published>2005-09-23T12:40:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-09-23T12:42:43.593-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Intelligence Briefing model of journalism</title><summary type='text'>Posted today at PressThink in reference to discussion on the NYT's Times Select paywall: What's valuable today? Information that comes with a high degree of confidence and carries predictive power.    What's parsley? Politicized opinion, infotainment, stenographic reporting and "analysis" of the obvious.    I think we are in the middle of a paradigm shift that will divide information and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112749376355341778'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112749376355341778'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/09/intelligence-briefing-model-of.html' title='The Intelligence Briefing model of journalism'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112559279686052779</id><published>2005-09-01T12:25:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-09-01T12:48:13.863-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Getting ahead of disaster</title><summary type='text'>The problem with a disaster like Katrina is that it is literally too large and too profound for the average person to wrap their brain around. Consequently, the media now resembles a bunch of blind men describing an elephant, only we're doing it around the clock.Making matters worse, in our rush to catch up with events, in our need to provide "hurricane porn" 24/7, we've overlooked another </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112559279686052779'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112559279686052779'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/09/getting-ahead-of-disaster.html' title='Getting ahead of disaster'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112406553948258367</id><published>2005-08-14T19:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-08-14T21:26:34.586-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Guerilla media</title><summary type='text'>Whilst cruising around the Chihuahua desert one afternoon in 1988 with my cavalry troop's executive officer, I listened as he waxed philosophical over an MRE."A tank costs $2.6 million," he said. "But what if you took that $2.6 million and bought a bunch of dune buggies, mounted guided missiles and machine guns on 'em, and offered each dune buggy crew some kind of bonus for harrying the hell out </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112406553948258367'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112406553948258367'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/08/guerilla-media.html' title='Guerilla media'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112229241918214184</id><published>2005-07-25T07:36:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-26T15:03:32.323-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Being wrong: It's a good thing</title><summary type='text'>One could argue that what truly distinguishes homo sapiens sapiens as a species isn't mental capacity, opposible thumbs or subcutaneous fat, but evidence that suggests we're the only animal that will choose death over being proven wrong.People don't like to be wrong, but they should really give it a try every now and again. Being proven wrong is the gateway to all new knowledge, and it's actually</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112229241918214184'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112229241918214184'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/being-wrong-its-good-thing.html' title='Being wrong: It&apos;s a good thing'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112195239005897581</id><published>2005-07-21T09:21:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-21T09:26:30.210-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The newspaper of the future</title><summary type='text'>Passed along from Andy Rhinehart this morning: This link to Digital Deliverance and its summary of New Media principles in the wake of the NYT's weekend story on "the newspaper of the future."Not so much new, but a really good summary to pass along to your colleagues.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.digitaldeliverance.com/MT/archives/000575.html' title='The newspaper of the future'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112195239005897581'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112195239005897581'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/newspaper-of-future.html' title='The newspaper of the future'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112178585065511081</id><published>2005-07-19T10:50:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-19T11:24:22.416-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Meanwhile, back at the ranch... an update</title><summary type='text'>Regular readers of this blog and/or PressThink know that back in June I wrote a long post about my dissatisfaction with the standard blog format and my desire to try something new.Since then I've been developing that new idea over at Typepad.com, a blog hosting service that offers unlimited team blogging (for a cost). In the next few days, I plan on taking it to the next phase, sending out author</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112178585065511081'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112178585065511081'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/meanwhile-back-at-ranch-update.html' title='Meanwhile, back at the ranch... an update'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112146959947876552</id><published>2005-07-15T17:49:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-16T12:44:55.990-04:00</updated><title type='text'>My say to the PressThink crowd</title><summary type='text'>Jay Rosen's July 7 post at PressThink on how the press should shun Novak until he comes clean (how positively Amish!) notched 265 comments, the majority of which I felt served as an example of how practically any media thread these days rapidly devolves into a political food fight.On Tuesday, a guy calling himself antimedia showed up on Rosen's comment board with a bunch of Rove stuff I hadn't </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112146959947876552'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112146959947876552'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/my-say-to-pressthink-crowd.html' title='My say to the PressThink crowd'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112146394009827674</id><published>2005-07-15T14:37:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-16T12:52:41.926-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Let's parse the Rove story... or not</title><summary type='text'>So here's the news: Karl Rove told the grand jury that Novak gave him Plame, not the other way around.And here's the Noise Machine spin: This is good news for Rove, and the Liberal Media is trying to hide it.And here's the deal: The Republicans have gone completely off the deep end.I want to make one thing clear, right up front: I'm not an expert on this story. Yeah, I've kept up with it better </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112146394009827674'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112146394009827674'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/lets-parse-rove-story-or-not.html' title='Let&apos;s parse the Rove story... or not'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112087336365162911</id><published>2005-07-08T20:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-08T22:23:12.463-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Finally, a funny comic strip!</title><summary type='text'>Bruce Tinsley is an idiot, but you gotta give the man his props: He's an idiot with the world's best business plan:1. Draw an insufferably pompous right-wing political cartoon about a reporter who is also a duck;2. Get prickly conservatives around the country to call local newspapers to lobby for its inclusion on the grounds that "It doesn't matter if it's funny -- you liberals run that commie </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112087336365162911'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112087336365162911'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/finally-funny-comic-strip.html' title='Finally, a funny comic strip!'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-112026780658309803</id><published>2005-07-01T20:51:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-07-01T21:35:09.130-04:00</updated><title type='text'>H5N1</title><summary type='text'>A couple of years ago I pushed the line of insubordination with my daily complaints about our off-the-charts fearmongering on West Nile Virus. I also talked a former boss out of assigning a blowout package on the threat of weaponized smallpox, writing a lengthy memo that detailed the problems with her "we're all gonna die" thesis.I tell these stories to prove a point to people who don't know me: </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112026780658309803'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/112026780658309803'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/07/h5n1.html' title='H5N1'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111991562931494156</id><published>2005-06-27T16:29:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-29T11:15:37.116-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Into the Great Wide Open</title><summary type='text'>Howdy, everybody. I’m back off of vacation, rested and tan and fired up … to put this little foray into blogging into RSS mothballs. That is to say: Your aggregator may occasionally find a new post here, but I expect they'll be rare.     The simple truth is, this six-month experiment has been so informative that I’ve now graduated to something new. That’s not to say that media is no longer a </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111991562931494156'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111991562931494156'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/into-great-wide-open.html' title='Into the Great Wide Open'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111818149357471610</id><published>2005-06-07T17:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-07T17:58:13.586-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Simply appalling</title><summary type='text'>Money talks. It always has.Here's a story demonstrates the way government works: It does what lobbyists, contributors and powerful men tell it to do. I'm not saying this is a new development. I'm saying it's happening right now, and the story below makes that apparent.The question is, where's the outrage? Where's the accountability? How is it that the White House doesn't even make a sincere </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111818149357471610'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111818149357471610'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/simply-appalling.html' title='Simply appalling'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111816797085680611</id><published>2005-06-07T11:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-07T14:12:50.890-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Spoletoblog: Howzitdoing?</title><summary type='text'>Editor's note: I've been on something of a hiatus from this blog since the start of the Spoleto festival on May 27. Also, I'm in the middle of an e-mail blackout: I haven't received an e-mail at my home account since May 23, so if you're wondering why I haven't written back, that's why. Here's a field report from "our little experiment," working towards the memo I will eventually write on what </summary><link rel='related' href='http://spoletoblog.typepad.com' title='Spoletoblog: Howzitdoing?'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111816797085680611'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111816797085680611'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/spoletoblog-howzitdoing.html' title='Spoletoblog: Howzitdoing?'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111764728739811383</id><published>2005-06-01T12:46:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-06-01T15:57:16.450-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Spoletoblog does something cool...</title><summary type='text'>Spoletoblog has been building a nice little audience over the past five days (more than 1,000 hits a day since Saturday). But what makes me happy about it is that we're already demonstrating the medium's natural ability to tackle the kinds of issues that tend to choke traditional newspapers.For instance: Our print edition has chosen not to address the controversy over a risque scene in Mabou </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111764728739811383'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111764728739811383'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/06/spoletoblog-does-something-cool.html' title='Spoletoblog does something cool...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111731504674831467</id><published>2005-05-28T17:09:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-28T17:17:26.753-04:00</updated><title type='text'>New (?) review</title><summary type='text'>From the Speculative Literature Foundation... Rich Horton's Market Summaries:   Anthologies: Miscellaneous, 2004 ...From Absolutely Brilliant in Chrome, Daniel Conover's "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" (another near novelette) was pretty fun satirical stuff about aliens kept under wraps by the White House for the technological knowledge they promise....Mine was the only short to get mentioned from</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111731504674831467'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111731504674831467'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/new-review.html' title='New (?) review'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111731392642890063</id><published>2005-05-28T16:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-28T16:58:46.443-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Spoletoblog update</title><summary type='text'>At the moment, Spoletoblog is close to notching its first 1,000-hit day (975 at 4:35 p.m.), although I've figured out that that's 975 since this time yesterday, which is not quite the same thing. Anyway, a thousand hits is good for a blog like this, no matter how you count them.The comments, however, are lagging. Obviously it's time for me to insult somebody's mom (although, on the bright side, </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.spoletoblog.typepad.com' title='Spoletoblog update'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111731392642890063'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111731392642890063'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/spoletoblog-update.html' title='Spoletoblog update'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111723119725221656</id><published>2005-05-27T17:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-27T17:59:57.276-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Abusing the Koran, and our trust</title><summary type='text'>Joe Conason has a new piece up at Salon advancing the Koran desecration story. If you're not a subscriber at Salon, be prepared to watch a little ad to get your free site pass (clever, que no?). It's relatively painless.Anyway, to summarize briefly: A Defense Department civilian employee assigned to military intelligence units gave Pentagon investigators a sworn statement last summer in which he </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111723119725221656'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111723119725221656'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/abusing-koran-and-our-trust.html' title='Abusing the Koran, and our trust'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111716061643007056</id><published>2005-05-26T22:18:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-26T22:23:36.436-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Judge: Enough with the paganism</title><summary type='text'>How pathetic is this? A judge in Indiana has prohibited the divorced parents of a 9-year-old boy from exposing him to their "non-mainstream" Wiccan religion.You could almost see it if somebody was complaining, or if one parent was trying to limit the other parent's rights. But their religon is one of the things on which the divorcing parents agree. This was nothing more than a judge simply not </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/NEWS01/505260481' title='Judge: Enough with the paganism'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111716061643007056'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111716061643007056'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/judge-enough-with-paganism.html' title='Judge: Enough with the paganism'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111715941336217246</id><published>2005-05-26T21:27:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-26T22:03:33.376-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Spoletoblog on the eve of the festival...</title><summary type='text'>The 2005 Spoleto festival starts at noon, but as far as I'm concerned it began tonight with a preview performance of Mabou Mines DollHouse (one of the things I'd actually like to see this year, having interviewed director Lee Breuer and found him utterly fascinating). Since we're actually going to start promoting the blog tomorrow, I figured it would be cool to go out and catch just a bit of the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111715941336217246'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111715941336217246'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/spoletoblog-on-eve-of-festival.html' title='Spoletoblog on the eve of the festival...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111704363297278020</id><published>2005-05-25T12:36:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-25T14:03:24.553-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Alternate realities</title><summary type='text'>Here's E&amp;P editor Greg Mitchell asking an extremely relevant question: In the week after (Newsweek's) retraction, where is the comparable outrage over the military's cover-up of the "friendly fire" death of Pat Tillman?The answer is, sadly, that those of us on the right are so bitterly entrenched at this point that they simply cannot consider that question. They literally cannot see it.Orson </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111704363297278020'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111704363297278020'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/alternate-realities.html' title='Alternate realities'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111694623766331786</id><published>2005-05-24T10:33:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-24T10:50:37.730-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Jerry Falwell on evolution</title><summary type='text'>Jerry Falwell is a creationist. Stop the presses. But I point out this piece by Falwell not for its arguments in favor of creationism (he doesn't make any), but instead for what it reveals about the passion surrounding the issue. In a challenge directed at Vanity Fair writer Christopher Hitchens, Falwell equates the assault on evolution in the public schools to "the efforts of religious </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.theconservativevoice.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5743' title='Jerry Falwell on evolution'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111694623766331786'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111694623766331786'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/jerry-falwell-on-evolution.html' title='Jerry Falwell on evolution'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111686683141396524</id><published>2005-05-23T12:42:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-23T12:47:11.423-04:00</updated><title type='text'>A new kind of journalist</title><summary type='text'>Jeff Jarvis promotes a link to a post in BusinessWeek's Blogspotting blog. I'm not familiar with the source, but the topic is interesting and pretty much in line with the conversation many of us have been having. What will journalists be? The description of the city editor of the future sounds an awful lot like Superman.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.buzzmachine.com/archives/2005_05_23.html#009724' title='A new kind of journalist'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111686683141396524'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111686683141396524'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/new-kind-of-journalist.html' title='A new kind of journalist'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111672738196954076</id><published>2005-05-21T21:32:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-21T22:57:31.036-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Spoletoblog.typepad.com</title><summary type='text'>In the morning, our paper will publish its 2005 Spoleto special section and, with it, the URL for our first blog, the cleverly named Spoletoblog. (For those of you who are "From Off," Spoleto is a three-week arts festival in Charleston, S.C. Each May, it brings world-class music and theater to our small, historic city. Piccolo Spoleto, a companion festival, offers a wider array of arts at more </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.spoletoblog.typepad.com/' title='Spoletoblog.typepad.com'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111672738196954076'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111672738196954076'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/spoletoblogtypepadcom.html' title='Spoletoblog.typepad.com'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111644788700961348</id><published>2005-05-18T16:11:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-18T16:24:47.036-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I become a whiner</title><summary type='text'>Rather predictably, the fallout over the Newsweek/Isikoff blunder drove me right into the ditch. I was so foul-tempered and snippy that I left a comment at PressThink that is so whiney and unintentionally ironic that it actually made me laugh at myself. My grousing complaint: People who complain about the press being ignoble, inaccurate, blah blah blah focus on the blunders, when of course the </summary><link rel='related' href='http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/05/17/nwsk_err.html#comment17940' title='I become a whiner'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111644788700961348'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111644788700961348'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/i-become-whiner.html' title='I become a whiner'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111626917955631823</id><published>2005-05-16T14:37:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-16T14:46:19.563-04:00</updated><title type='text'>First the WSJ, now the NYT...</title><summary type='text'>The New York Times launches itself as a premium content site with TimesSelect, but what I like about this one is that you get it as part of your subscription to the print edition. Critics will say "but the spirit of the medium is a la carte... why bundle?" I say that establishing yourself as a multi-dimensional information source is a good thing. You subscribe, you get all the web stuff free. You</summary><link rel='related' href='http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20050516005886&amp;newsLang=en' title='First the WSJ, now the NYT...'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111626917955631823'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111626917955631823'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/first-wsj-now-nyt.html' title='First the WSJ, now the NYT...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111626682874899415</id><published>2005-05-16T13:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-16T15:04:07.223-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Dang. Monday.</title><summary type='text'>Had to bury another cat this morning, so that now I've got a matched set of little rescue kitties sleeping in the dirt next to the too-small stray I took in while Janet was out of town last August. The great irony: Janet went out and got the two littermates to "cheer me up" after the little one gave up and died. Both have now been hit by cars. Pixie survived long enough to reach the emergency vet</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111626682874899415'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111626682874899415'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/dang-monday.html' title='Dang. Monday.'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111611547512901320</id><published>2005-05-14T17:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-15T11:28:10.420-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Running out of patience...</title><summary type='text'>Whatever you do, make sure you check out this link from E&amp;P: It's a transcript of Scott McClellan blowing smoke up the White House press corps' collective ass on May 12, the day after the Cessna incident. Several things jump out at you: 1. McClellan's talking-points act is wearing thin (can you imagine having to deal with such an insufferable jerk day in, day out?); 2. The WH press corps, which </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111611547512901320'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111611547512901320'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/running-out-of-patience.html' title='Running out of patience...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111598876300120118</id><published>2005-05-13T08:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-13T08:52:43.033-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Letters to the editor</title><summary type='text'>Two back-to-back letters on the pagan package, the only ones that have appeared so far.Appalled at sectionI was appalled at this past Sunday's section of Faith &amp; Values. The editor(s) missed a great opportunity with this section and showed a great lack of judgment, publishing a section almost exclusively on paganism, witchcraft and Wicca.One would think you could have come up with a better </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111598876300120118'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111598876300120118'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/letters-to-editor.html' title='Letters to the editor'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111574714001363794</id><published>2005-05-10T13:03:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-11T09:29:00.543-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The pagan story: What we learned...</title><summary type='text'>On Sunday, my story on neo-pagans in the Lowcountry appeared on the cover of our Faith and Values section. The mainbar ran about 95 inches and told a story of the last 14 months in the local pagan community, beginning with the suicide of that community's most visible and controversial figure. The sidebars, just counting the text, ran another 80 inches. You can find my links to all the elements of</summary><link rel='related' href='http://neopagans.blogspot.com/2005/05/links-to-package.html' title='The pagan story: What we learned...'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111574714001363794'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111574714001363794'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/pagan-story-what-we-learned.html' title='The pagan story: What we learned...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111573383720539627</id><published>2005-05-10T09:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-10T10:03:57.406-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Oooo, I wouldn't have told that one...</title><summary type='text'>Here's one of those things that you just couldn't make up (link).Well, I guess you could make it up. In fact, it reminds me of a joke......WHICH I won't tell here. In summary, the joke concerns a church revival in which members of the congregation come down to the altar and confess their sins (murder, adultery, coveting, the works), and after each confession, the preacher says "Well, that's a </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.newshounds.us/2005/05/06/bizarre_sex_habits_of_the_extreme_rightwing.php#more' title='Oooo, I wouldn&apos;t have told that one...'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111573383720539627'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111573383720539627'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/oooo-i-wouldnt-have-told-that-one.html' title='Oooo, I wouldn&apos;t have told that one...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111557742577672664</id><published>2005-05-08T14:18:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-08T14:37:05.923-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Google ranks credibility</title><summary type='text'>Here's a BTC piece on Google doing something akin to what I first suggested online back in January: scoring the credibility of information sources. Starting with news organization and bloggers is one thing, but what you're really grading here, it seems, is popularity and clout. It's not what I want, but whatever. It's a start.The real trick is grading EVERYBODY: Let's pin the Long Tail on </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/index.php?p=934' title='Google ranks credibility'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111557742577672664'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111557742577672664'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/google-ranks-credibility.html' title='Google ranks credibility'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111555872695150462</id><published>2005-05-08T09:05:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-08T09:25:27.100-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Geek humor</title><summary type='text'>A clever little lyrical romp by a talented and complex software designer.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://thesassers.com/dewey/RawCode.html' title='Geek humor'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111555872695150462'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111555872695150462'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/geek-humor.html' title='Geek humor'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111550870196154745</id><published>2005-05-07T18:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-07T19:39:38.026-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Recognizing and writing about proxies</title><summary type='text'>Perhaps the most valuable realization I ever had while running the local news operation came in the 1990s during the "Where Are My Glasses?" scandal. Given the right set of circumstances, a story can become a proxy for a complex set of emotions and grievances. When that happens, you've really got two stories, not one. And you should act accordingly.The "Where are my glasses?" story in a nutshell:</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111550870196154745'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111550870196154745'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/recognizing-and-writing-about-proxies.html' title='Recognizing and writing about proxies'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111548766614216721</id><published>2005-05-07T13:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-07T13:46:20.520-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Yikes!</title><summary type='text'>Sounds like the folks over at East Waynesville Baptist are now fully committed. According to Radosh (and this link off a WNC TV station), the church tossed some members who refused to toe its political line.Then a bunch more folks quit in protest. I remember this church from my cub reporter days at The (Waynesville, NC) Mountaineer, 1990-1992. The thing that strikes me about this is that nine </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111548766614216721'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111548766614216721'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/yikes.html' title='Yikes!'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111538744841656827</id><published>2005-05-06T09:42:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-06T09:50:48.583-04:00</updated><title type='text'>And so, in conclusion...</title><summary type='text'>We're all hard-wired to relate to group norms. This is a value-neutral statement. This behavior is useful, and since we're not going to change our neurology, the best thing to do is to become aware of the dynamic. Much of the cultural tension in America today is the result of being stuck in the middle of a transition between norms. The new norm attempts to judge others by whether they are </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111538744841656827'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111538744841656827'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/and-so-in-conclusion.html' title='And so, in conclusion...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111535490905883818</id><published>2005-05-05T23:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-06T00:52:15.356-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Turning it around, again</title><summary type='text'>So I went rambling the other day and wrote this long thing on normative behavior, socio-biology, instinct and media conferred legitimacy. But what happens when I turn that lens on myself instead of using it to peer into other people's heads?Lo and behold, I do it too. I get furious when people drive to the front of a line of cars trying to merge and then force their way in ahead of everybody who </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111535490905883818'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111535490905883818'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/turning-it-around-again.html' title='Turning it around, again'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111523856439390359</id><published>2005-05-04T14:17:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-04T16:56:48.420-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Legitimacy, and who controls it</title><summary type='text'>So this morning Janet and I got into a newspaper-and-coffee-on-the-porch conversation about the paganism package (which I wrote and she's designing), and it dawned on me it might make a good post. Janet was a little amazed that there were people around the newsroom who apparently feel no pang of conscience when it comes to making disparaging remarks about the pagan story -- or pagans in general, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111523856439390359'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111523856439390359'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/legitimacy-and-who-controls-it.html' title='Legitimacy, and who controls it'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111515554210933686</id><published>2005-05-03T16:27:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-03T17:25:42.113-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Hot Dang!</title><summary type='text'>Ever have one of those days when you feel like you're water popping on the surface of a deep-fat fryer? I mean, consider:Circulation is in big trouble... The Sun in Baltimore just dropped 11.5 percent daily... just a litany of bad circulation figures... E&amp;P called yesterday "Black Monday."This morning we held our first serious meeting about the future of our online enterprise, and the boss </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111515554210933686'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111515554210933686'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/hot-dang.html' title='Hot Dang!'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111505012145040613</id><published>2005-05-02T12:05:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-02T12:08:41.450-04:00</updated><title type='text'>A cool beta: kinja.com</title><summary type='text'>Speaking of things that filter and connect, here's a cool beta site: kinja.com.At first glance, it seems a pretty simple online aggregator, but what caught my eye was its combination of customized watchlists and editors suggestions.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://kinja.com' title='A cool beta: kinja.com'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111505012145040613'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111505012145040613'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/cool-beta-kinjacom.html' title='A cool beta: kinja.com'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111504496811191626</id><published>2005-05-02T10:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-02T10:42:48.113-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Happy Birthday, Dave Winer</title><summary type='text'>Happy Birthday to you,Happy Birthday to you,Happy Birthday Dave WinerYou pretty much invented this mediumand we all really appreciate it, at least most of the time...</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.scripting.com/' title='Happy Birthday, Dave Winer'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111504496811191626'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111504496811191626'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/happy-birthday-dave-winer.html' title='Happy Birthday, Dave Winer'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111504419794430635</id><published>2005-05-02T10:12:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-05-02T10:32:02.033-04:00</updated><title type='text'>An e-mail</title><summary type='text'>Here's an e-mail, received this morning from a conservative reader. I like to post these from time to time because I think they capture a sense of fear and frustration that struggles to be heard in the culture. Is the writer appealing to a nostalgic myth of the past? I think so. Does this statement leave out horrors (public lynchings) and injustices (second-class citizenship for many Americans)? </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111504419794430635'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111504419794430635'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/05/e-mail.html' title='An e-mail'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111489456394658239</id><published>2005-04-30T16:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-30T16:56:03.953-04:00</updated><title type='text'>What should I write about?</title><summary type='text'>On Friday, I sent out an e-mail to many of the people I've written about or interviewed in the past 17 months and invited them to suggest story ideas, profile subjects, etc. Scientists are over-represented, African-Americans are under-represented, but this is a pretty interesting cross section of the Lowcountry. Here are excerpts from some of the first replies (names withheld):Development: I have</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111489456394658239'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111489456394658239'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/what-should-i-write-about.html' title='What should I write about?'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111483938796604787</id><published>2005-04-30T01:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-30T01:36:27.966-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The news-side addiction</title><summary type='text'>I've been in features now for 17 months, but every now and then I'll get tapped to do something over in news. Most of the time it's pretty simple. When I break stuff it's usually because the subject is so obscure that nobody else cares enough to cover it. Today I actually blundered into news. I'd been assigned a vague news-side piece on South Carolina's latest attempt to ban same-sex marriage (we</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111483938796604787'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111483938796604787'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/news-side-addiction.html' title='The news-side addiction'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111461676581177170</id><published>2005-04-27T10:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-27T11:52:06.176-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Back to normal? What's normal?</title><summary type='text'>My uncomfortable brush with traffic from an A-List blog should have subsided by now (I don't actually track such things, so guessing), and I'm breathing a bit easier. There's no evidence that I've horribly offended anyone I respect, and there's been no ominous message that begins "Conover, please come see me in my office." The experience (like so many) was instructive. It taught me that I've </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111461676581177170'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111461676581177170'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/back-to-normal-whats-normal.html' title='Back to normal? What&apos;s normal?'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111446631689798044</id><published>2005-04-25T17:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-25T17:58:36.900-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The 'Uh-Oh Feeling"</title><summary type='text'>Hi. Jay Rosen included my post on Tim Porter's blog in a thing he put up this afternoon at PressThink, and that means one thing: much more traffic than this blog normally receives. For those of you who are here merely to get a bit of background to go with Rosen's comments, let me sum up this blog so you can go back about your regularly scheduled life: I blog about the stuff I'm trying to do. It </summary><link rel='related' href='http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/04/25/tp_ltrs.html' title='The &apos;Uh-Oh Feeling&quot;'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111446631689798044'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111446631689798044'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/uh-oh-feeling.html' title='The &apos;Uh-Oh Feeling&quot;'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111444598540884940</id><published>2005-04-25T11:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-25T12:19:45.410-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Deep Thoughts on Tim Porter</title><summary type='text'>Tim Porter's Friday blogpost, "The Mood of the Newsroom," was uniformly praised by some of my favorite people in New Media. Plus, I consider myself a Tim Porter fan. So why did I feel the urge to talk back to it? Am I one of the defensive newsroom people he describes? Am I really reacting to Porter's ideas, or to my emotions on the subject? Am I simply that much of a knee-jerk contrarian? God I </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.timporter.com/firstdraft/archives/000442.html' title='Deep Thoughts on Tim Porter'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111444598540884940'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111444598540884940'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/deep-thoughts-on-tim-porter.html' title='Deep Thoughts on Tim Porter'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111409899386380678</id><published>2005-04-21T11:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-21T11:56:33.863-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Stand-alone journalism"</title><summary type='text'>Great post at PressThink this morning here.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/04/21/nol_stnd.html' title='&quot;Stand-alone journalism&quot;'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111409899386380678'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111409899386380678'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/stand-alone-journalism.html' title='&quot;Stand-alone journalism&quot;'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111397473092483171</id><published>2005-04-20T01:17:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-20T01:27:47.283-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Great Gawd Awmity</title><summary type='text'>Whew. I just finished jamming out one of the longest non-fiction articles I've ever written in my life, the kind of magazine-style prose that makes newspaper editors sit up and shout "CONOVER, YOU SUCK!"And maybe they're right. I'm not sure. I didn't want to write this story so long. I'm sick of long stories and constantly trying to find ways to write things shorter... or at least break them down</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111397473092483171'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111397473092483171'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/great-gawd-awmity.html' title='Great Gawd Awmity'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111387499248789101</id><published>2005-04-18T21:08:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-18T21:47:43.460-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Global Warming hits the streets</title><summary type='text'>My little experiment went out with the morning paper, but whatever feedback I'm going to get is likely to be slow in coming. It wasn't exactly promoted, even though we devoted two open inside pages in the Health/Science page to my materials. No promo off the front page, so people are going to find it slowly, if at all (for those of you keeping score at home, it's the section BEHIND the automobile</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111387499248789101'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111387499248789101'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/global-warming-hits-streets.html' title='Global Warming hits the streets'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111348577693396304</id><published>2005-04-14T09:04:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-14T09:36:16.936-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Blogger wire service</title><summary type='text'>A few years back, I imagined what it might be like if one stood the notion of an international wire service on its head. Rather than a series of bureaus sending reports back to a central office, I doodled with the idea of something more like a loose intelligence network. Something like this: I own stock in a factory in Kiev, and political unrest leads to riots there. I'm reading the news stories </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111348577693396304'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111348577693396304'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/blogger-wire-service.html' title='Blogger wire service'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111340007557072709</id><published>2005-04-13T09:42:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-13T09:53:09.936-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Napoleon Dynamite:" the concurrent resolution</title><summary type='text'>I just think this is kinda cool: Idaho is in the process of honoring the 2004 indie-film-hit "Napoleon Dynamite" with a state resolution. Lawmakers do goofy stuff like that all the time, but the guy who wrote this one was really on his game. Consider the ultimate "WHEREAS" clause:WHEREAS, any members of the House of Representatives or the Senate of the Legislature of the State of Idaho who choose</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www3.state.id.us/oasis/HCR029.html#daily' title='&quot;Napoleon Dynamite:&quot; the concurrent resolution'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111340007557072709'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111340007557072709'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/napoleon-dynamite-concurrent.html' title='&quot;Napoleon Dynamite:&quot; the concurrent resolution'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111333075500562681</id><published>2005-04-12T14:29:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-12T14:39:53.623-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The vanishing journalist</title><summary type='text'>The American Society of Newspaper Editors revealed a study today that shows the number of working journalists at American newspapers has declined 4 percent since 2001. Findings:* Overall staffing in newsrooms tumbled from an estimated 56,393 to 54,134 today — a four percent decline.    * Numbers of white men fell the most, decreasing by a net 1,744 or 5.5 percent. The number of white women </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?id=5648' title='The vanishing journalist'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111333075500562681'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111333075500562681'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/vanishing-journalist.html' title='The vanishing journalist'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111332403360974042</id><published>2005-04-12T10:08:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-12T12:40:33.610-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Blogging, Zen, podcasting and pagans</title><summary type='text'>I love my Zen Micro as a technology, but I've got to adjust to it. The ability to reliably record a three-hour interview is great, but now that I have that ability, the task of retrieving notes from something that big is just daunting. I'm not sure how many hours it took me to get my eight pages of notes out of my recording of my sit-down with pagan poster family The McGreggors, but it was </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111332403360974042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111332403360974042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/blogging-zen-podcasting-and-pagans.html' title='Blogging, Zen, podcasting and pagans'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111323326935849072</id><published>2005-04-11T11:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-11T11:27:49.360-04:00</updated><title type='text'>More Zen...</title><summary type='text'>The Zen Micro does a much better job of recording meetings than I first imagined: I recorded two long events Friday and Saturday (a group meeting and a group interview) and you can make out everything everybody says. Not only that, but the ability to download an audio file to a computer makes transcription much easier -- more and better controls for playback, etc. The thing I really want now is a</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111323326935849072'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111323326935849072'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/more-zen.html' title='More Zen...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111290381502842082</id><published>2005-04-07T15:01:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-07T15:56:55.030-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I get Zen</title><summary type='text'>Yesterday an editor suggested that I road-test my idea for a daily Spoleto podcast by creating something similar out of stuff that's going on now that has nothing to do with Spoleto... a mock-up, in a sense. And since my favorite idea was to hangout at the door to venues and stick a microphone in people's faces as they exited, that put the pressure on me to come up with a portable recording </summary><link rel='related' href='http://us.creative.com/products/products.asp?category=213&amp;subcategory=214&amp;product=10795' title='I get Zen'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111290381502842082'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111290381502842082'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/i-get-zen_07.html' title='I get Zen'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111281475979646383</id><published>2005-04-06T14:49:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-06T15:17:39.330-04:00</updated><title type='text'>So, to atone...</title><summary type='text'>Here's the transcript of testimony given by a Baptist preacher last week at a hearing on a bill to ban gay marriage in South Carolina. It arrived in my e-mail this morning.I don't offer it as an endorsement of a religion -- as I said in my previous post, I am not a Christian. I don't offer it as proof that all Southerners are right on race or sexuality, or even that the preacher is representative</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.oaklandchurch.com/index.htm' title='So, to atone...'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111281475979646383'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111281475979646383'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/so-to-atone.html' title='So, to atone...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111281296236186497</id><published>2005-04-06T10:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-06T15:25:22.616-04:00</updated><title type='text'>In which I gaze at my navel</title><summary type='text'>This will be a long post, so forgive me. Or skip it.First, some confessions: My father is a Christian minister, but I am not myself a Christian. That fact should not be read as a personal condemnation of Christianity, and I feel that I respect the faith to this day. But it is also true that I have been too harsh in judgment of my Christian brothers and sisters. I don't say this to retract my </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111281296236186497'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111281296236186497'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/in-which-i-gaze-at-my-navel.html' title='In which I gaze at my navel'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111279628350352719</id><published>2005-04-06T09:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-06T10:04:43.503-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Bye, cat</title><summary type='text'>One of our two almost-year-old cats, El Presidente De Todos De Los Gatos, was hit and killed across the street from our house this morning. We buried him in the back yard just after sunrise. He was a really nice cat. I didn't want to have pets again, but kittens grow on you. I will miss him very much.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111279628350352719'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111279628350352719'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/bye-cat.html' title='Bye, cat'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111262855478803482</id><published>2005-04-04T11:27:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-04T11:29:14.786-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Very cool blog link</title><summary type='text'>My friend Robert Huffman sent me this link in an e-mail: PostSecret, a collaborative art project. I love it.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://postsecret.blogspot.com/' title='Very cool blog link'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111262855478803482'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111262855478803482'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/very-cool-blog-link.html' title='Very cool blog link'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111262498245606244</id><published>2005-04-04T10:27:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-04T10:29:42.456-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Big news in Bluffton</title><summary type='text'>Steve Yelvington announced the launch of Bluffton Today on Friday while I was out of town. Not only is it big news for New Media, it's just down the road.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://blufftontoday.com' title='Big news in Bluffton'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111262498245606244'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111262498245606244'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/big-news-in-bluffton.html' title='Big news in Bluffton'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111258199025587357</id><published>2005-04-03T21:56:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-04T09:04:12.206-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Don't go see "Sin City"</title><summary type='text'>I think I'm pretty much free to make this statement because nobody is ever going to accuse me of being hip, but Richard Rodriguez's "Sin City" is an amoral, moronic piece of trash.But why should anyone care? Bad stuff gets made all the time. Well, here are a few reasons: It's being marketed as cool. It's being lionized. Put another way, "Sin City" isn't just a bad movie: It's pathology being </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111258199025587357'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111258199025587357'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/dont-go-see-sin-city.html' title='Don&apos;t go see &quot;Sin City&quot;'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111256292242568253</id><published>2005-04-03T16:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2005-04-03T17:17:37.556-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Punching the tar baby</title><summary type='text'>I shouldn't have done it, but I stuck my nose into the faux "diversity in blogging" debate. Like the Schiavo case, one should just let these things play out and trust that people will pick out the credibility of the sides on their own.But I do get frustrated by it all. Here's my position: There is real, structural inequality in the "real world." Depending on how, where and to whom you are born, </summary><link rel='related' href='http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2005/03/31/tnn_vs.html' title='Punching the tar baby'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111256292242568253'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111256292242568253'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/punching-tar-baby.html' title='Punching the tar baby'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111250682653154988</id><published>2005-04-03T00:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-04-03T00:40:26.533-05:00</updated><title type='text'>And a good time was had by all...</title><summary type='text'>We turned our three-night camping trip into a two-nighter and drove home after a full day of hiking today, arriving at home in time to watch the second half of the UNC-MSU game. Perfect timing. We got rain. We got 46-mph wind. We got SNOW (sort of). We had a blast. But with a chance of real snow in the forecast, it was time to come home. We really just weren't set up for that.</summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.southcarolinaparks.com/stateparks/parkdetail.asp?PID=350' title='And a good time was had by all...'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111250682653154988'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111250682653154988'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/04/and-good-time-was-had-by-all.html' title='And a good time was had by all...'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111219962576201576</id><published>2005-03-30T11:02:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-03-30T11:20:25.766-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Suggestions, please</title><summary type='text'>A week ago I got the go-ahead to explore creating a single-event blog for the newspaper. The concept calls for a team blog that would post bits from more than a dozen reporters, editors and reviewers involved in covering a three-week international arts festival here in town. It would be the paper's first formal step into the blogosphere. Yesterday I got to spend about 40 minutes on the phone with</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111219962576201576'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111219962576201576'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/03/suggestions-please.html' title='Suggestions, please'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10112343.post-111219851531519713</id><published>2005-03-30T10:56:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2005-03-30T11:01:55.316-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Got My Mojo Workin'</title><summary type='text'>Dave Winer, in an act of valuable public service, has posted the lyrics to "Got My Mojo Workin'" here.This cleared up some decades-old misconceptions for me. For instance, I had interpreted the line "I got some red-hot tips I have to keep on ice" as having something to do with a choice portion of the female anatomy "keeping Hell on ice."Come to think of it, though, "keeping Hell on ice" is a </summary><link rel='related' href='http://static2.podcatch.com/blogs/gems/snedit/mojo.txt' title='Got My Mojo Workin&apos;'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111219851531519713'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10112343/posts/default/111219851531519713'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://conovermedia.blogspot.com/2005/03/got-my-mojo-workin.html' title='Got My Mojo Workin&apos;'/><author><name>Daniel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03899114436024719014</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='33' height='28' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/355/161/320/Dan-Conover2.1.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
